Project measure / variable:   Gould3   FC_immediate_0

ID, description, units MPD:47341   FC_immediate_0   withdrawal study group, percent immobility in training chamber after first stimulus pairing   [%]  control  
nicotine study
Data set, strains Gould3   inbred   8 strains     sex: m     age: 8-12wks
Procedure fear conditioning test
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Gould3 - withdrawal study group, percent immobility in training chamber after first stimulus pairing control



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Male
Number of strains tested8 strains
Mean of the strain means14.0   %
Median of the strain means8.60   %
SD of the strain means± 15.9
Coefficient of variation (CV)1.14
Min–max range of strain means0.593   –   41.1   %
Mean sample size per strain14.0   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 7 24850.8811 3550.1259 29.4591 < 0.0001
Residuals 104 12533.0561 120.5102


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S6/SvEvTac m 16.0 10.3   12 2.98 0.647 0.13
A/J m 17.7 11.7   16 2.93 0.663 0.24
BALB/cByJ m 1.19 3.01   14 0.806 2.54 -0.8
C3H/HeJ m 0.593 2.22   14 0.593 3.74 -0.84
C57BL/6J m 1.19 3.01   14 0.806 2.54 -0.8
CBA/J m 1.19 4.46   14 1.19 3.74 -0.8
DBA/1J m 32.7 22.3   14 5.95 0.681 1.18
DBA/2J m 41.1 13.3   14 3.54 0.323 16.7, 58.3 1.71


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S6/SvEvTac m 15.975 3.169 22.2592 9.6908
A/J m 17.7 2.7444 23.1423 12.2577
BALB/cByJ m 1.1857 2.9339 7.0038 0.0
C3H/HeJ m 0.5929 2.9339 6.4109 0.0
C57BL/6J m 1.1857 2.9339 7.0038 0.0
CBA/J m 1.1929 2.9339 7.0109 0.0
DBA/1J m 32.7357 2.9339 38.5538 26.9176
DBA/2J m 41.0714 2.9339 46.8895 35.2534




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS