Project measure / variable:   Schughart5   pctbw_ctrl_d1

ID, description, units MPD:58811   pctbw_ctrl_d1   body weight as percent of baseline   [%]  post i.p. day 1  
Data set, strains Schughart5   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: f     age: 8-12wks
Procedure body weight
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Schughart5 - body weight as percent of baseline post i.p. day 1



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Female
Number of strains tested8 strains
Mean of the strain means97.4   %
Median of the strain means98.2   %
SD of the strain means± 2.96
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.0304
Min–max range of strain means90.5   –   100   %
Mean sample size per strain3.9   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 7 232.3612 33.1945 7.325 0.0001
Residuals 23 104.2284 4.5317


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 99.4 2.38   3 1.37 0.0239 96.8, 101.0 0.68
A/J f 97.0 0.317   4 0.158 0.00326 96.6, 97.3 -0.14
C57BL/6J f 90.5 3.83   4 1.91 0.0423 88.0, 96.2 -2.33
CAST/EiJ f 98.6 1.11   4 0.557 0.0113 97.2, 99.9 0.41
NOD/ShiLtJ f 97.8 2.99   3 1.73 0.0306 94.5, 100.0 0.14
NZO/HlLtJ f 100.0 0.978   3 0.564 0.00977 99.5, 101.0 0.88
PWK/PhJ f 98.5 1.45   4 0.727 0.0148 97.0, 100.0 0.37
WSB/EiJ f 97.4 1.94   6 0.791 0.0199 95.1, 100.0 0.0


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 99.3867 1.229 101.9291 96.8442
A/J f 97.045 1.0644 99.2468 94.8432
C57BL/6J f 90.54 1.0644 92.7418 88.3382
CAST/EiJ f 98.5675 1.0644 100.7693 96.3657
NOD/ShiLtJ f 97.82 1.229 100.3625 95.2775
NZO/HlLtJ f 100.0933 1.229 102.6358 97.5509
PWK/PhJ f 98.4825 1.0644 100.6843 96.2807
WSB/EiJ f 97.41 0.8691 99.2078 95.6122




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS