Project measure / variable:   CSNA03   trials_in_rev_Binghamton

ID, description, units MPD:112874   trials_in_rev_Binghamton   total number of trials (reversal learning assay), founders   [n]  reversal  
Data set, strains CSNA03   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: both     age:
Procedure operant conditioning chamber
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

CSNA03 - total number of trials (reversal learning assay), founders reversal



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested8 strains8 strains
Mean of the strain means117.3   n 112.4   n
Median of the strain means125.8   n 110.6   n
SD of the strain means± 22.131 ± 16.915
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.1886 0.1505
Min–max range of strain means82.43   –   141.8   n 79.4   –   129.8   n
Mean sample size per strain6.0   mice 4.9   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 299.4907 299.4907 0.0893 0.766
strain 7 15603.0133 2229.0019 0.6646 0.7011
sex:strain 7 16775.7526 2396.5361 0.7145 0.6599
Residuals 71 238134.1571 3354.0022


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 125.6 49.521   7 18.717 0.3944 83.0, 199.0 0.37
129S1/SvImJ m 129.0 75.71   5 33.86 0.5869 42.0, 241.0 0.98
A/J f 141.8 24.219   6 9.8874 0.1708 110.0, 166.0 1.11
A/J m 127.4 74.91   5 33.502 0.588 20.0, 229.0 0.89
C57BL/6J f 126.0 67.19   5 30.05 0.5333 39.0, 215.0 0.39
C57BL/6J m 107.0 30.906   6 12.617 0.2888 70.0, 152.0 -0.32
CAST/EiJ f 82.71 64.72   7 24.463 0.7825 20.0, 180.0 -1.56
CAST/EiJ m 129.8 44.962   4 22.481 0.3465 85.0, 176.0 1.03
NOD/ShiLtJ f 124.4 99.61   5 44.547 0.8007 42.0, 290.0 0.32
NOD/ShiLtJ m 79.4 61.12   5 27.332 0.7697 24.0, 161.0 -1.95
NZO/HlLtJ f 82.43 39.719   7 15.012 0.4819 20.0, 127.0 -1.58
NZO/HlLtJ m 114.2 26.475   4 13.237 0.2317 87.0, 148.0 0.11
PWK/PhJ f 128.2 82.77   6 33.791 0.6458 48.0, 283.0 0.49
PWK/PhJ m 106.3 35.892   6 14.653 0.3375 50.0, 146.0 -0.36
WSB/EiJ f 127.4 44.517   5 19.909 0.3494 66.0, 182.0 0.46
WSB/EiJ m 106.0 45.658   4 22.829 0.4307 68.0, 166.0 -0.38


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 125.5714285714 21.889339262 169.2175314194 81.9253257235
129S1/SvImJ m 129.0 25.8998154946 180.6427653339 77.3572346661
A/J f 141.8333333333 23.6431886361 188.9765125089 94.6901541578
A/J m 127.4 25.8998154946 179.0427653339 75.7572346661
C57BL/6J f 126.0 25.8998154946 177.6427653339 74.3572346661
C57BL/6J m 107.0 23.6431886361 154.1431791756 59.8568208244
CAST/EiJ f 82.7142857143 21.889339262 126.3603885622 39.0681828664
CAST/EiJ m 129.75 28.9568740253 187.4883669164 72.0116330836
NOD/ShiLtJ f 124.4 25.8998154946 176.0427653339 72.7572346661
NOD/ShiLtJ m 79.4 25.8998154946 131.0427653339 27.7572346661
NZO/HlLtJ f 82.4285714286 21.889339262 126.0746742765 38.7824685806
NZO/HlLtJ m 114.25 28.9568740253 171.9883669164 56.5116330836
PWK/PhJ f 128.1666666667 23.6431886361 175.3098458422 81.0234874911
PWK/PhJ m 106.3333333333 23.6431886361 153.4765125089 59.1901541578
WSB/EiJ f 127.4 25.8998154946 179.0427653339 75.7572346661
WSB/EiJ m 106.0 28.9568740253 163.7383669164 48.2616330836


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 127.2857142857 16.9554092842 161.0938401771 93.4775883943
A/J both 134.6166666667 17.5342579793 169.5789840745 99.6543492588
C57BL/6J both 116.5 17.5342579793 151.4623174079 81.5376825921
CAST/EiJ both 106.2321428571 18.1496813102 142.4215795341 70.0427061802
NOD/ShiLtJ both 101.9 18.3139351677 138.4169495669 65.3830504331
NZO/HlLtJ both 98.3392857143 18.1496813102 134.5287223912 62.1498490373
PWK/PhJ both 117.25 16.7182590134 150.5852616817 83.9147383183
WSB/EiJ both 116.7 19.424861621 155.4320740005 77.9679259995




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS