Project measure / variable:   CSNA02   pokes_incorr_acq

ID, description, units MPD:62210   pokes_incorr_acq   number of anticipatory nose pokes made in incorrect flanking hole during reversal learning   [n]  acquisition  
Data set, strains CSNA02   inbred   10 strains     sex: both     age: 12-14wks
Procedure operant conditioning chamber
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

CSNA02 - number of anticipatory nose pokes made in incorrect flanking hole during reversal learning acquisition



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested10 strains10 strains
Mean of the strain means0.56313   n 0.4283   n
Median of the strain means0.44166   n 0.45708   n
SD of the strain means± 0.34836 ± 0.24443
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.6186 0.5707
Min–max range of strain means0.16167   –   1.06   n 0.085   –   0.88667   n
Mean sample size per strain5.2   mice 4.6   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 0.3263 0.3263 1.2358 0.2697
strain 9 6.1409 0.6823 2.5844 0.0116
sex:strain 9 2.3373 0.2597 0.9836 0.4603
Residuals 78 20.5933 0.264


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 0.42333 0.35635   6 0.14548 0.8418 0.06, 1.0 -0.4
129S1/SvImJ m 0.88667 1.2251   6 0.50015 1.3817 0.06, 3.2 1.88
A/J f 0.99833 1.1056   6 0.45136 1.1074 0.07, 2.99 1.25
A/J m 0.58 0.37303   5 0.16682 0.6432 0.28, 1.2 0.62
C57BL/6J f 0.32167 0.17069   6 0.06969 0.5307 0.13, 0.63 -0.69
C57BL/6J m 0.13333 0.07448   6 0.0304 0.5586 -1.21
CAST/EiJ f 0.19 0.15401   6 0.06288 0.8106 0.09, 0.48 -1.07
CAST/EiJ m 0.085 0.07047   4 0.03524 0.8291 0.01, 0.18 -1.4
CC004/TauUncJ f 1.06 0.66468   2   0.47 0.6271 0.59, 1.53 1.43
CC004/TauUncJ m 0.50667 0.38553   3 0.22259 0.7609 0.11, 0.88 0.32
CC041/TauUncJ f 0.46 0.31512   3 0.18193 0.685 0.15, 0.78 -0.3
CC041/TauUncJ m 0.60333 0.26764   3 0.15452 0.4436 0.36, 0.89 0.72
NOD/ShiLtJ f 0.668 0.44958   5 0.20106 0.673 0.25, 1.36 0.3
NOD/ShiLtJ m 0.528 0.23424   5 0.10476 0.4436 0.2, 0.81 0.41
NZO/HlLtJ f 1.0143 0.6702   7 0.25331 0.6608 0.27, 2.28 1.3
NZO/HlLtJ m 0.4075 0.20222   4 0.10111 0.4962 0.13, 0.6 -0.09
PWK/PhJ f 0.16167 0.20865   6 0.08518 1.2906 -1.15
PWK/PhJ m 0.22 0.12853   6 0.05247 0.5842 0.07, 0.41 -0.85
WSB/EiJ f 0.334 0.18091   5 0.08091 0.5417 0.1, 0.55 -0.66
WSB/EiJ m 0.3325 0.20073   4 0.10036 0.6037 0.13, 0.61 -0.39


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 0.4233 0.2098 0.8409 0.0057
129S1/SvImJ m 0.8867 0.2098 1.3043 0.4691
A/J f 0.9983 0.2098 1.4159 0.5807
A/J m 0.58 0.2298 1.0375 0.1225
C57BL/6J f 0.3217 0.2098 0.7393 -0.0959
C57BL/6J m 0.1333 0.2098 0.5509 -0.2843
CAST/EiJ f 0.19 0.2098 0.6076 -0.2276
CAST/EiJ m 0.085 0.2569 0.5965 -0.4265
CC004/TauUncJ f 1.06 0.3633 1.7833 0.3367
CC004/TauUncJ m 0.5067 0.2967 1.0973 -0.0839
CC041/TauUncJ f 0.46 0.2967 1.0506 -0.1306
CC041/TauUncJ m 0.6033 0.2967 1.1939 0.0127
NOD/ShiLtJ f 0.668 0.2298 1.1255 0.2105
NOD/ShiLtJ m 0.528 0.2298 0.9855 0.0705
NZO/HlLtJ f 1.0143 0.1942 1.4009 0.6276
NZO/HlLtJ m 0.4075 0.2569 0.919 -0.104
PWK/PhJ f 0.1617 0.2098 0.5793 -0.2559
PWK/PhJ m 0.22 0.2098 0.6376 -0.1976
WSB/EiJ f 0.334 0.2298 0.7915 -0.1235
WSB/EiJ m 0.3325 0.2569 0.844 -0.179


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 0.655 0.1483 0.9503 0.3597
A/J both 0.7892 0.1556 1.0989 0.4795
C57BL/6J both 0.2275 0.1483 0.5228 -0.0678
CAST/EiJ both 0.1375 0.1658 0.4677 -0.1927
CC004/TauUncJ both 0.7833 0.2345 1.2502 0.3164
CC041/TauUncJ both 0.5317 0.2098 0.9493 0.1141
NOD/ShiLtJ both 0.598 0.1625 0.9215 0.2745
NZO/HlLtJ both 0.7109 0.161 1.0315 0.3903
PWK/PhJ both 0.1908 0.1483 0.4861 -0.1045
WSB/EiJ both 0.3332 0.1723 0.6764 -0.0099




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS