Project measure / variable:   Jaxpheno2   bw8

ID, description, units MPD:22750   bw8   body weight   [g]  at age 8wks  
Data set, strains Jaxpheno2   inbred   11 strains     sex: both     age: 8wks
Procedure body weight
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Jaxpheno2 - body weight at age 8wks



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested11 strains11 strains
Mean of the strain means19.9   g 24.6   g
Median of the strain means19.9   g 24.3   g
SD of the strain means± 1.45 ± 1.07
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.0726 0.0436
Min–max range of strain means17.8   –   22.9   g 22.8   –   26.7   g
Mean sample size per strain7.9   mice 8.9   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 1042.7825 1042.7825 357.4065 < 0.0001
strain 10 250.3628 25.0363 8.581 < 0.0001
sex:strain 10 35.6137 3.5614 1.2206 0.281
Residuals 169 493.0807 2.9176


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J f 18.9 1.22   5 0.544 0.0642 17.4, 20.4 -0.72
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J m 24.1 2.87   5 1.28 0.119 20.1, 27.1 -0.5
B6D2F1/J f 22.9 3.28   6 1.34 0.143 20.0, 29.2 2.04
B6D2F1/J m 26.7 0.867   5 0.388 0.0325 25.3, 27.4 1.92
BALB/cByJ f 19.4 1.31   10 0.415 0.0676 17.9, 21.3 -0.38
BALB/cByJ m 23.9 0.715   10 0.226 0.0299 22.5, 25.2 -0.69
BALB/cJ f 19.9 1.44   10 0.454 0.0721 18.3, 23.4 -0.03
BALB/cJ m 24.1 1.84   10 0.582 0.0762 21.6, 27.6 -0.5
C3H/HeJ f 19.4 1.97   5 0.881 0.101 17.1, 21.9 -0.38
C3H/HeJ m 24.8 3.04   5 1.36 0.123 22.6, 29.9 0.15
C57BL/6J f 17.8 1.02   15 0.262 0.057 16.3, 20.3 -1.48
C57BL/6J m 24.3 1.37   15 0.354 0.0566 22.5, 27.3 -0.31
CBA/J f 21.0 1.34   10 0.425 0.064 19.2, 23.7 0.73
CBA/J m 24.7 1.9   15 0.49 0.0768 20.5, 28.3 0.06
DBA/2J f 18.2 1.2   10 0.381 0.0662 16.2, 19.9 -1.21
DBA/2J m 22.8 1.42   15 0.368 0.0625 20.1, 25.0 -1.71
FVB/NJ f 20.3 0.321   5 0.144 0.0158 19.8, 20.6 0.24
FVB/NJ m 24.2 2.28   5 1.02 0.0942 20.5, 26.0 -0.41
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J f 20.5 0.856   5 0.383 0.0418 19.0, 21.1 0.38
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J m 25.4 0.455   5 0.203 0.0179 24.7, 25.9 0.71
NOD/ShiLtJ f 21.1 1.85   10 0.586 0.0876 19.3, 25.7 0.8
NOD/ShiLtJ m 26.0 2.81   10 0.889 0.108 21.7, 30.8 1.27


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J f 18.94 0.7639 20.448 17.432
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J m 24.14 0.7639 25.648 22.632
B6D2F1/J f 22.9167 0.6973 24.2933 21.5401
B6D2F1/J m 26.72 0.7639 28.228 25.212
BALB/cByJ f 19.42 0.5402 20.4863 18.3537
BALB/cByJ m 23.88 0.5402 24.9463 22.8137
BALB/cJ f 19.92 0.5402 20.9863 18.8537
BALB/cJ m 24.14 0.5402 25.2063 23.0737
C3H/HeJ f 19.44 0.7639 20.948 17.932
C3H/HeJ m 24.78 0.7639 26.288 23.272
C57BL/6J f 17.8333 0.441 18.704 16.9627
C57BL/6J m 24.2667 0.441 25.1373 23.396
CBA/J f 20.99 0.5402 22.0563 19.9237
CBA/J m 24.7133 0.441 25.584 23.8427
DBA/2J f 18.18 0.5402 19.2463 17.1137
DBA/2J m 22.8067 0.441 23.6773 21.936
FVB/NJ f 20.34 0.7639 21.848 18.832
FVB/NJ m 24.16 0.7639 25.668 22.652
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J f 20.48 0.7639 21.988 18.972
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J m 25.38 0.7639 26.888 23.872
NOD/ShiLtJ f 21.13 0.5402 22.1963 20.0637
NOD/ShiLtJ m 26.01 0.5402 27.0763 24.9437


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J both 21.54 0.5402 22.6063 20.4737
B6D2F1/J both 24.8183 0.5172 25.8393 23.7974
BALB/cByJ both 21.65 0.3819 22.404 20.896
BALB/cJ both 22.03 0.3819 22.784 21.276
C3H/HeJ both 22.11 0.5402 23.1763 21.0437
C57BL/6J both 21.05 0.3119 21.6656 20.4344
CBA/J both 22.8517 0.3487 23.54 22.1634
DBA/2J both 20.4933 0.3487 21.1816 19.805
FVB/NJ both 22.25 0.5402 23.3163 21.1837
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J both 22.93 0.5402 23.9963 21.8637
NOD/ShiLtJ both 23.57 0.3819 24.324 22.816




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS