Intervention: rapamycin mTOR complex repressor, anti-aging | ||||
Rapa_lo effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p < 0.0001 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
856 | 778 | |
|
1035 | 881 | | |
1140 | 988 | | |
1218 | 1066 | | |
1322 | 1229 | ||
115 | 242 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p < 0.0001 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
933 | 778 | |
|
1079 | 881 | | |
1202 | 988 | | |
1287 | 1066 | | |
1412 | 1229 | ||
116 | 242 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p < 0.0001 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
1050 | 778 | |
|
1130 | 881 | | |
1214 | 988 | | |
1278 | 1066 | | |
1323 | 1229 | ||
120 | 242 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.199 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.1805 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
565 | 616 | |
|
834 | 807 | | |
1013 | 973 | | |
1160 | 1094 | | |
1464 | 1338 | ||
150 | 295 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0034 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0068 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
624 | 616 | |
|
884 | 807 | | |
1054 | 973 | | |
1178 | 1094 | | |
1298 | 1338 | ||
142 | 295 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0009 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
683 | 616 | |
|
984 | 807 | | |
1110 | 973 | | |
1184 | 1094 | | |
1348 | 1338 | ||
120 | 295 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0003 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
897 | 768 | |
|
1050 | 894 | | |
1138 | 976 | | |
1219 | 1051 | | |
1322 | 1197 | ||
28 | 60 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0003 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
901 | 768 | |
|
985 | 894 | | |
1183 | 976 | | |
1278 | 1051 | | |
1412 | 1197 | ||
28 | 60 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0002 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
958 | 768 | |
|
1078 | 894 | | |
1193 | 976 | | |
1283 | 1051 | | |
1291 | 1197 | ||
32 | 60 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.5172 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7779 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
540 | 606 | |
|
761 | 807 | | |
943 | 941 | | |
1106 | 1061 | | |
1217 | 1338 | ||
54 | 101 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.6077 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4109 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
536 | 606 | |
|
718 | 807 | | |
1023 | 941 | | |
1156 | 1061 | | |
1271 | 1338 | ||
52 | 101 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.009 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0191 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
634 | 606 | |
|
835 | 807 | | |
1142 | 941 | | |
1272 | 1061 | | |
1344 | 1338 | ||
47 | 101 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0002 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
856 | 797 | |
|
1065 | 886 | | |
1160 | 1008 | | |
1217 | 1088 | | |
1287 | 1229 | ||
43 | 90 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p < 0.0001 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
940 | 797 | |
|
1090 | 886 | | |
1222 | 1008 | | |
1285 | 1088 | | |
1389 | 1229 | ||
44 | 90 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0003 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
1072 | 797 | |
|
1160 | 886 | | |
1198 | 1008 | | |
1274 | 1088 | | |
1323 | 1229 | ||
44 | 90 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.023 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.1454 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
822 | 742 | |
|
990 | 925 | | |
1146 | 1077 | | |
1298 | 1151 | | |
1464 | 1325 | ||
48 | 95 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.2832 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.3606 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
826 | 742 | |
|
1004 | 925 | | |
1100 | 1077 | | |
1203 | 1151 | | |
1269 | 1325 | ||
42 | 95 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0033 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.3344 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
954 | 742 | |
|
1075 | 925 | | |
1142 | 1077 | | |
1270 | 1151 | | |
1348 | 1325 | ||
36 | 95 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0005 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0019 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
850 | 750 | |
|
950 | 866 | | |
1112 | 994 | | |
1218 | 1062 | | |
1287 | 1213 | ||
44 | 92 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0002 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
1010 | 750 | |
|
1095 | 866 | | |
1196 | 994 | | |
1314 | 1062 | | |
1379 | 1213 | ||
44 | 92 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p < 0.0001 | |
Wang-Allison test | p < 0.0001 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
1072 | 750 | |
|
1137 | 866 | | |
1225 | 994 | | |
1259 | 1062 | | |
1321 | 1213 | ||
44 | 92 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.5503 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7708 |
Quantiles | Rapa_lo | Control | |
466 | 497 | |
|
665 | 704 | | |
926 | 903 | | |
1025 | 1013 | | |
1261 | 1133 | ||
48 | 99 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_mid effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0005 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0066 |
Quantiles | Rapa_mid | Control | |
600 | 497 | |
|
854 | 704 | | |
1038 | 903 | | |
1178 | 1013 | | |
1298 | 1133 | ||
48 | 99 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Rapa_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0032 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0216 |
Quantiles | Rapa_hi | Control | |
650 | 497 | |
|
893 | 704 | | |
1046 | 903 | | |
1098 | 1013 | | |
1126 | 1133 | ||
37 | 99 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |