Project measure / variable:   Bolivar1   RF_time_pct_d1

ID, description, units MPD:63455   RF_time_pct_d1   percentage of time spent in right-front of arena, 5 min test in dark   [%]  day 1  
Data set, strains Bolivar1   inbred   10 strains     sex: both     age:
Procedure open field test
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Bolivar1 - percentage of time spent in right-front of arena, 5 min test in dark day 1



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested10 strains10 strains
Mean of the strain means12.2   % 12.492   %
Median of the strain means12.866   % 10.478   %
SD of the strain means± 2.5002 ± 4.4981
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.2049 0.3601
Min–max range of strain means6.8611   –   15.3   % 7.4417   –   22.103   %
Mean sample size per strain12.0   mice 12.0   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 5.1042 5.1042 0.0471 0.8284
strain 9 1310.7141 145.6349 1.343 0.216
sex:strain 9 1549.4968 172.1663 1.5877 0.1201
Residuals 220 23856.5413 108.4388


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 6.8611 4.426   12 1.2777 0.6451 -2.14
129S1/SvImJ m 17.211 24.4   12 7.0436 1.4177 1.05
A/J f 14.033 14.121   12 4.0764 1.0063 0.73
A/J m 22.103 20.543   12 5.9302 0.9294 1.133333333, 81.6 2.14
B6129SF1/J f 13.017 9.138   12 2.6379 0.702 3.966666667, 32.66666667 0.33
B6129SF1/J m 10.289 2.3538   12 0.67949 0.2288 7.366666667, 14.66666667 -0.49
B6C3F1/J f 9.0694 2.0181   12 0.58257 0.2225 7.2, 14.8 -1.25
B6C3F1/J m 10.667 3.6106   12 1.0423 0.3385 5.966666667, 16.56666667 -0.41
BALB/cByJ f 11.483 3.6167   12 1.0441 0.315 7.1, 19.96666667 -0.29
BALB/cByJ m 7.4417 2.0714   12 0.59795 0.2783 4.666666667, 10.63333333 -1.12
C3H/HeJ f 15.3 8.8486   12 2.5544 0.5783 5.833333333, 37.43333333 1.24
C3H/HeJ m 10.272 4.0385   12 1.1658 0.3931 4.9, 20.83333333 -0.49
C57BL/6J f 13.542 9.3516   12 2.6996 0.6906 5.6, 37.2 0.54
C57BL/6J m 12.936 7.3625   12 2.1254 0.5691 5.2, 29.4 0.1
CBA/J f 12.5 4.2892   12 1.2382 0.3431 5.7, 20.33333333 0.12
CBA/J m 9.3778 6.445   12 1.8605 0.6873 5.133333333, 28.36666667 -0.69
DBA/2J f 12.714 4.1841   12 1.2078 0.3291 7.2, 21.3 0.21
DBA/2J m 15.383 20.992   12 6.0598 1.3646 0.64
FVB/NJ f 13.483 7.1623   12 2.0676 0.5312 5.0, 29.16666667 0.51
FVB/NJ m 9.2389 1.8028   12 0.52042 0.1951 7.066666667, 12.06666667 -0.72


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 6.8611 3.0061 12.7855 0.9367
129S1/SvImJ m 17.2111 3.0061 23.1355 11.2867
A/J f 14.0333 3.0061 19.9577 8.1089
A/J m 22.1028 3.0061 28.0272 16.1784
B6129SF1/J f 13.0167 3.0061 18.9411 7.0923
B6129SF1/J m 10.2889 3.0061 16.2133 4.3645
B6C3F1/J f 9.0694 3.0061 14.9939 3.145
B6C3F1/J m 10.6667 3.0061 16.5911 4.7423
BALB/cByJ f 11.4833 3.0061 17.4077 5.5589
BALB/cByJ m 7.4417 3.0061 13.3661 1.5173
C3H/HeJ f 15.3 3.0061 21.2244 9.3756
C3H/HeJ m 10.2722 3.0061 16.1966 4.3478
C57BL/6J f 13.5417 3.0061 19.4661 7.6173
C57BL/6J m 12.9361 3.0061 18.8605 7.0117
CBA/J f 12.5 3.0061 18.4244 6.5756
CBA/J m 9.3778 3.0061 15.3022 3.4534
DBA/2J f 12.7139 3.0061 18.6383 6.7895
DBA/2J m 15.3833 3.0061 21.3077 9.4589
FVB/NJ f 13.4833 3.0061 19.4077 7.5589
FVB/NJ m 9.2389 3.0061 15.1633 3.3145


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 12.0361 2.1256 16.2253 7.8469
A/J both 18.0681 2.1256 22.2573 13.8789
B6129SF1/J both 11.6528 2.1256 15.842 7.4636
B6C3F1/J both 9.8681 2.1256 14.0573 5.6789
BALB/cByJ both 9.4625 2.1256 13.6517 5.2733
C3H/HeJ both 12.7861 2.1256 16.9753 8.5969
C57BL/6J both 13.2389 2.1256 17.4281 9.0497
CBA/J both 10.9389 2.1256 15.1281 6.7497
DBA/2J both 14.0486 2.1256 18.2378 9.8594
FVB/NJ both 11.3611 2.1256 15.5503 7.1719




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS