Project measure / variable:   Jaxpheno4   BASO8

ID, description, units MPD:22918   BASO8   basophil count (BASO; units per volume x 103)   [n/µL]  at age 8wks  
Data set, strains Jaxpheno4   inbred   11 strains     sex: both     age: 8wks
Procedure complete blood count
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Jaxpheno4 - basophil count (BASO; units per volume x 103) at age 8wks



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested11 strains11 strains
Mean of the strain means0.00774   n/µL 0.00782   n/µL
Median of the strain means0.00690   n/µL 0.00538   n/µL
SD of the strain means± 0.00340 ± 0.00601
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.440 0.768
Min–max range of strain means0.000909   –   0.0130   n/µL 0.00167   –   0.0195   n/µL
Mean sample size per strain17.0   mice 17.7   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 0.0 0.0 0.0356 0.8505
strain 10 0.0055 0.0006 12.2458 < 0.0001
sex:strain 10 0.0024 0.0002 5.3557 < 0.0001
Residuals 386 0.0174 0.0


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J f 0.012 0.00422   10 0.00133 0.351 0.01, 0.02 1.25
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J m 0.016 0.00843   10 0.00267 0.527 0.01, 0.03 1.36
B6D2F1/J f 0.008 0.00422   10 0.00133 0.527 0.08
B6D2F1/J m 0.005 0.00674   12 0.00195 1.35 -0.47
BALB/cByJ f 0.00905 0.00625   21 0.00136 0.691 0.38
BALB/cByJ m 0.0085 0.00587   20 0.00131 0.691 0.11
BALB/cJ f 0.00636 0.00581   22 0.00124 0.913 -0.41
BALB/cJ m 0.0195 0.0132   21 0.00288 0.677 1.94
C3H/HeJ f 0.00615 0.00506   13 0.0014 0.823 -0.47
C3H/HeJ m 0.00182 0.00405   11 0.00122 2.22 -1.0
C57BL/6J f 0.0069 0.0078   42 0.0012 1.13 -0.25
C57BL/6J m 0.005 0.00564   34 0.000967 1.13 -0.47
CBA/J f 0.00571 0.00507   21 0.00111 0.887 -0.6
CBA/J m 0.00348 0.00487   23 0.00102 1.4 -0.72
DBA/2J f 0.013 0.00559   23 0.00117 0.428 1.54
DBA/2J m 0.014 0.0114   20 0.00255 0.816 1.03
FVB/NJ f 0.0109 0.00302   11 0.000909 0.276 0.01, 0.02 0.93
FVB/NJ m 0.00571 0.00646   14 0.00173 1.13 -0.35
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J f 0.000909 0.00302   11 0.000909 3.32 -2.01
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J m 0.00167 0.00389   12 0.00112 2.34 -1.02
NOD/ShiLtJ f 0.00619 0.00498   21 0.00109 0.804 -0.46
NOD/ShiLtJ m 0.00538 0.00508   26 0.000997 0.944 -0.41


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J f 0.012 0.0021 0.0162 0.0078
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J m 0.016 0.0021 0.0202 0.0118
B6D2F1/J f 0.008 0.0021 0.0122 0.0038
B6D2F1/J m 0.005 0.0019 0.0088 0.0012
BALB/cByJ f 0.009 0.0015 0.0119 0.0062
BALB/cByJ m 0.0085 0.0015 0.0114 0.0056
BALB/cJ f 0.0064 0.0014 0.0092 0.0036
BALB/cJ m 0.0195 0.0015 0.0224 0.0166
C3H/HeJ f 0.0062 0.0019 0.0098 0.0025
C3H/HeJ m 0.0018 0.002 0.0058 0.0
C57BL/6J f 0.0069 0.001 0.0089 0.0049
C57BL/6J m 0.005 0.0011 0.0073 0.0027
CBA/J f 0.0057 0.0015 0.0086 0.0028
CBA/J m 0.0035 0.0014 0.0062 0.0007
DBA/2J f 0.013 0.0014 0.0158 0.0103
DBA/2J m 0.014 0.0015 0.0169 0.0111
FVB/NJ f 0.0109 0.002 0.0149 0.0069
FVB/NJ m 0.0057 0.0018 0.0092 0.0022
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J f 0.0009 0.002 0.0049 0.0
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J m 0.0017 0.0019 0.0055 0.0
NOD/ShiLtJ f 0.0062 0.0015 0.0091 0.0033
NOD/ShiLtJ m 0.0054 0.0013 0.008 0.0028


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/J both 0.014 0.0015 0.0169 0.0111
B6D2F1/J both 0.0065 0.0014 0.0093 0.0037
BALB/cByJ both 0.0088 0.001 0.0108 0.0067
BALB/cJ both 0.0129 0.001 0.015 0.0109
C3H/HeJ both 0.004 0.0014 0.0067 0.0013
C57BL/6J both 0.006 0.0008 0.0075 0.0044
CBA/J both 0.0046 0.001 0.0066 0.0026
DBA/2J both 0.0135 0.001 0.0155 0.0115
FVB/NJ both 0.0083 0.0014 0.011 0.0057
NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J both 0.0013 0.0014 0.004 0.0
NOD/ShiLtJ both 0.0058 0.001 0.0077 0.0039




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS