Project measure / variable:   Odet2   sperm_vigor_10

ID, description, units MPD:53835   sperm_vigor_10   percentage of motile sperm that are 'vigorous'   [%]  at 10 min  
Data set, strains Odet2   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: m     age: 10-66wks
Procedure microscopy
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Odet2 - percentage of motile sperm that are 'vigorous' at 10 min



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Male
Number of strains tested8 strains
Mean of the strain means58.9   %
Median of the strain means57.4   %
SD of the strain means± 19.7
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.335
Min–max range of strain means32.5   –   87.7   %
Mean sample size per strain14.5   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 7 38809.5178 5544.2168 17.1423 < 0.0001
Residuals 108 34929.7326 323.4234


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ m 48.9 16.8   17 4.07 0.343 15.2, 76.4 -0.51
A/J m 59.2 22.1   17 5.36 0.373 13.4, 79.8 0.01
C57BL/6J m 32.5 19.1   11 5.76 0.588 5.5, 62.5 -1.34
CAST/EiJ m 39.8 9.99   12 2.89 0.251 27.7, 55.5 -0.97
NOD/ShiLtJ m 62.2 23.9   10 7.56 0.384 14.1, 85.6 0.17
NZO/HlLtJ m 55.6 17.0   16 4.24 0.305 19.4, 80.1 -0.17
PWK/PhJ m 87.7 5.04   15 1.3 0.0575 78.9, 95.5 1.46
WSB/EiJ m 85.5 21.8   18 5.13 0.254 0.4, 94.7 1.35


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ m 48.9471 4.3618 57.5928 40.3013
A/J m 59.2294 4.3618 67.8752 50.5837
C57BL/6J m 32.4727 5.4224 43.2208 21.7246
CAST/EiJ m 39.7917 5.1915 50.0822 29.5012
NOD/ShiLtJ m 62.23 5.687 73.5027 50.9573
NZO/HlLtJ m 55.5625 4.496 64.4743 46.6507
PWK/PhJ m 87.66 4.6434 96.8641 78.4559
WSB/EiJ m 85.4944 4.2389 93.8966 77.0923




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS