Project measure / variable:   CSNA03   diff_trials_rev_acq_in_JAX

ID, description, units MPD:113850   diff_trials_rev_acq_in_JAX   reversal trials minus acquisition trials (reversal learning assay), founders   [n]  
Data set, strains CSNA03   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: both     age:
Procedure operant conditioning chamber
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

CSNA03 - reversal trials minus acquisition trials (reversal learning assay), founders



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested8 strains8 strains
Mean of the strain means41.589   n 51.85   n
Median of the strain means34.604   n 56.12   n
SD of the strain means± 31.184 ± 29.868
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.7498 0.5761
Min–max range of strain means-7.6667   –   100.0   n -18.0   –   78.55   n
Mean sample size per strain7.6   mice 6.9   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 3273.341 3273.341 0.4862 0.4872
strain 7 51711.5218 7387.3603 1.0973 0.3708
sex:strain 7 28198.7945 4028.3992 0.5983 0.7559
Residuals 100 673259.1013 6732.591


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f -7.6667 27.574   3 15.92 -3.5966 -34.0, 21.0 -1.58
129S1/SvImJ m 57.75 89.8   4 44.901 1.555 -24.0, 181.0 0.2
A/J f 37.833 64.07   6 26.155 1.6934 -41.0, 113.0 -0.12
A/J m -18.0 100.7   5 45.033 -5.5943 -172.0, 81.0 -2.34
C57BL/6J f 53.07 92.52   14 24.727 1.7433 -25.0, 339.0 0.37
C57BL/6J m 78.55 95.64   11 28.836 1.2176 -99.0, 284.0 0.89
CAST/EiJ f 29.6 61.6   10 19.478 2.0809 -77.0, 128.0 -0.38
CAST/EiJ m 62.5 91.53   8 32.362 1.4646 -50.0, 200.0 0.36
NOD/ShiLtJ f 31.375 50.03   8 17.688 1.5945 -20.0, 127.0 -0.33
NOD/ShiLtJ m 52.36 62.89   11 18.963 1.2011 -78.0, 145.0 0.02
NZO/HlLtJ f 61.0 14.731   3 8.5049 0.2415 45.0, 74.0 0.62
NZO/HlLtJ m 53.0 22.627   2   16.0 0.4269 37.0, 69.0 0.04
PWK/PhJ f 100.0 108.4   9 36.147 1.0844 4.0, 377.0 1.87
PWK/PhJ m 74.12 128.8   8 45.553 1.7382 -97.0, 307.0 0.75
WSB/EiJ f 27.5 45.217   8 15.987 1.6443 -30.0, 94.0 -0.45
WSB/EiJ m 54.5 40.752   6 16.637 0.7477 15.0, 121.0 0.09


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f -7.6666666667 47.372956466 86.3199297101 -101.6532630435
129S1/SvImJ m 57.75 41.0261837519 139.1447800775 -23.6447800775
A/J f 37.8333333333 33.497738762 104.291892972 -28.6252263053
A/J m -18.0 36.6949342907 54.8017045068 -90.8017045068
C57BL/6J f 53.0714285714 21.9294176409 96.5787685888 9.564088554
C57BL/6J m 78.5454545455 24.7397196519 127.628353711 29.4625553799
CAST/EiJ f 29.6 25.9472368721 81.0785789387 -21.8785789387
CAST/EiJ m 62.5 29.0098927372 120.054800946 4.945199054
NOD/ShiLtJ f 31.375 29.0098927372 88.929800946 -26.179800946
NOD/ShiLtJ m 52.3636363636 24.7397196519 101.4465355292 3.2807371981
NZO/HlLtJ f 61.0 47.372956466 154.9865963768 -32.9865963768
NZO/HlLtJ m 53.0 58.0197854744 168.109601892 -62.109601892
PWK/PhJ f 100.0 27.350789168 154.2631867184 45.7368132816
PWK/PhJ m 74.125 29.0098927372 131.679800946 16.570199054
WSB/EiJ f 27.5 29.0098927372 85.054800946 -30.054800946
WSB/EiJ m 54.5 33.497738762 120.9585596387 -11.9585596387


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 25.0416666667 31.3342654197 87.2079568133 -37.1246234799
A/J both 9.9166666667 24.8425879528 59.2036536114 -39.370320278
C57BL/6J both 65.8084415584 16.5299204968 98.6033330276 33.0135500893
CAST/EiJ both 46.05 19.4604276541 84.658934204 7.441065796
NOD/ShiLtJ both 41.8693181818 19.0632342814 79.6902320471 4.0484043165
NZO/HlLtJ both 57.0 37.4516104821 131.3029285194 -17.3029285194
PWK/PhJ both 87.0625 19.9351419905 126.613253927 47.511746073
WSB/EiJ both 41.0 22.1566715618 84.9582053239 -2.9582053239




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS