Project measure / variable:   Odet1   sperm_per_testis

ID, description, units MPD:53732   sperm_per_testis   sperm count per mg testis weight (x 103)   [n]  
Data set, strains Odet1   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: m     age: 10-66wks
Procedure sperm count
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Odet1 - sperm count per mg testis weight (x 103)



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Male
Number of strains tested8 strains
Mean of the strain means98.6   n
Median of the strain means99.9   n
SD of the strain means± 30.3
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.307
Min–max range of strain means58.7   –   152   n
Mean sample size per strain19.8   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 7 143203.9006 20457.7001 9.3216 < 0.0001
Residuals 150 329196.7812 2194.6452


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ m 79.4 38.4   23 8.0 0.483 24.7, 155.0 -0.63
A/J m 58.7 36.0   19 8.25 0.613 14.9, 167.0 -1.32
C57BL/6J m 152.0 46.4   30 8.48 0.306 49.2, 239.0 1.76
CAST/EiJ m 69.1 22.5   9 7.49 0.325 21.8, 97.2 -0.97
NOD/ShiLtJ m 106.0 47.3   17 11.5 0.448 39.5, 205.0 0.24
NZO/HlLtJ m 107.0 45.1   20 10.1 0.419 50.8, 215.0 0.28
PWK/PhJ m 93.8 29.8   14 7.97 0.318 59.1, 156.0 -0.16
WSB/EiJ m 123.0 69.6   26 13.6 0.565 30.2, 278.0 0.8


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ m 79.42 9.7683 98.7212 60.1188
A/J m 58.6832 10.7474 79.9191 37.4472
C57BL/6J m 151.6933 8.5531 168.5934 134.7933
CAST/EiJ m 69.0544 15.6157 99.9096 38.1993
NOD/ShiLtJ m 105.5876 11.3621 128.038 83.1373
NZO/HlLtJ m 107.45 10.4753 128.1482 86.7518
PWK/PhJ m 93.7993 12.5204 118.5384 69.0602
WSB/EiJ m 123.0573 9.1875 141.2109 104.9038




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS