Home       About             Help      

Select plot or tool >
Pheno measurements correlated to your selected measurements

Pearson correlation p value
must be p ≤


Download all
At least
strains
in common
are required
Include:
females and males
females only
males only

Order by


More info on correlations


Your selected measurement:
behavior — involuntary movement         open field test  
Crowley1
stereotypy_d0   repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 0   [n]
27 strains   age 9-28wks
  Inbred
 

Download this list as a tab-delimited file
 
Correlated measurement from anywhere in MPD
(organized by category)
Sex Pearson
r
p value
on r
Spearman
rs
# strains
in
common
Click
for
scatterplot
Log-
improved
Pearson
behavior – anxiety
Wiltshire2   OFT_thig_cont  
percent time avoiding center (thigmotaxis)
male –0.77 p = 0.0005 –0.72 16 Plot  
Pletcher1   OFT_thigmotaxis  
percent of center avoidance (thigmotaxis)
male –0.73 p = 0.0006 –0.70 18 Plot -0.76
Wiltshire2   OFT_thig_fluox  
percent time avoiding center (thigmotaxis) (fluoxetine )
male –0.65 p = 0.0065 –0.63 16 Plot  
Flaherty1   closed3  
time in closed quadrant 3
male 0.85 p = 0.0076 0.88 8 Plot  
Flaherty1   pct_close3  
percent of time in closed quadrant 3
male 0.85 p = 0.0076 0.88 8 Plot  
behavior – balance and coordination
Crabbe1   bal15_doseB  
missteps crossing 15.8 mm balance beam (ethanol 1.2g/kg i.p.)
male –0.90 p = 0.0022 –0.83 8 Plot  
behavior – exploratory
Crowley1   pct_center_d0  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 0
male 0.78 p < 0.0001 0.79 27 Plot 0.81
Crowley1   pct_center_d120  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.59 p = 0.0016 0.62 26 Plot 0.65
Wahlsten1   dist_ave_OFT  
average distance traveled in 1 min
male 0.71 p = 0.0041 0.70 14 Plot  
Brown1   trans_LD  
transitions between light and dark zones
male 0.75 p = 0.0053 0.65 12 Plot  
behavior – involuntary movement
Crowley1   stereotypy_d120  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.83 p < 0.0001 0.84 26 Plot  
Crowley1   stereotypy_d30  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.81 p < 0.0001 0.84 27 Plot 0.86
Crowley1   stereotypy_d60  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.79 p < 0.0001 0.82 27 Plot 0.83
behavior – locomotor activity
Crowley1   vertical_actd0  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 0
male 0.83 p < 0.0001 0.78 27 Plot  
Crowley1   horizontal_actd0  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 0
male 0.81 p < 0.0001 0.79 27 Plot 0.84
Wiltshire1   act_OFT  
total locomotor activity, 10 min
male 0.80 p < 0.0001 0.77 20 Plot  
Pletcher1   OFT_activity  
total distance traveled, 7 min
male 0.82 p < 0.0001 0.81 18 Plot 0.89
Wiltshire2   OFT_dist_cont  
total distance traveled, 7 min
male 0.82 p < 0.0001 0.85 16 Plot 0.89
Crowley1   vertical_actd30  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.68 p < 0.0001 0.70 27 Plot 0.81
Crowley1   vertical_actd120  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.67 p = 0.0002 0.63 26 Plot  
Crowley1   vertical_actd60  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.65 p = 0.0002 0.66 27 Plot 0.74
Wiltshire2   OFT_dist_fluox  
total distance traveled, 7 min (fluoxetine )
male 0.80 p = 0.0002 0.80 16 Plot 0.90
Wiltshire1   rear_OFT  
total rearing events, 10 min
male 0.68 p = 0.0011 0.58 20 Plot 0.78
Seburn1   aa_light  
ambulatory, light 12h period (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.84 p = 0.0014 0.92 11 Plot 0.88
Crowley1   horizontal_actd120  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.58 p = 0.0017 0.64 26 Plot 0.65
Schalkwyk1   pct_rear_OFTobj  
rearing frequency with novel object
male 0.90 p = 0.0021 0.88 8 Plot  
Richfield1   horiz1  
number of horizontal beam breaks, 45 min session, day 1
male 0.87 p = 0.0021 0.88 9 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min5  
distance traveled, during 5th minute
male 0.74 p = 0.0022 0.70 14 Plot 0.79
Richfield1   amb1  
total ambulatory activity, 45 min session, day 1
male 0.87 p = 0.0025 0.85 9 Plot  
Seburn1   tot_light  
total, light 12h period (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.81 p = 0.0027 0.90 11 Plot 0.84
Brown1   activity_LD  
total activity (line crosses plus rearing, dur=5min))
male 0.77 p = 0.0032 0.81 12 Plot 0.81
Seburn1   tot_daily  
total, daily (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.79 p = 0.0036 0.82 11 Plot  
Richfield1   horiz_rate  
horizontal beam breaks per minute
male 0.85 p = 0.0037 0.78 9 Plot  
Richfield1   horiz_aver  
daily average number of horizontal beam breaks per 45 min session
male 0.85 p = 0.0037 0.78 9 Plot  
Seburn1   aa_daily  
ambulatory, daily (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.79 p = 0.0040 0.84 11 Plot  
Wahlsten1   speed_ave_OFT  
average speed over 5 min trial
male 0.71 p = 0.0041 0.70 14 Plot 0.74
Richfield1   horiz2  
number of horizontal beam breaks, 45 min session, day 2
male 0.84 p = 0.0042 0.75 9 Plot  
Richfield1   amb_aver  
daily average ambulatory activity per 45 min session
male 0.84 p = 0.0051 0.78 9 Plot  
Richfield1   vert1  
number of vertical beam breaks (rearing), 45 min session, day 1
male 0.83 p = 0.0051 0.78 9 Plot 0.90
Richfield1   amb_rate  
rate of ambulatory activity per minute
male 0.83 p = 0.0052 0.78 9 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min4  
distance traveled, during 4th minute
male 0.70 p = 0.0055 0.59 14 Plot  
Richfield1   amb2  
total ambulatory activity, 45 min session, day 2
male 0.83 p = 0.0058 0.77 9 Plot  
Thomsen1   activ_cocaine1_56  
total activity (horizontal plus vertical beam breaks), test 1, 3h duration (cocaine 56 mg/kg i.p.)
male 0.82 p = 0.0067 0.88 9 Plot 0.85
Richfield1   vert_rate  
vertical beam breaks per minute
male 0.82 p = 0.0074 0.82 9 Plot 0.85
Richfield1   vert_aver  
daily average number of vertical beam breaks per 45 min session
male 0.82 p = 0.0074 0.82 9 Plot 0.87
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min2  
distance traveled during 2nd minute
male 0.68 p = 0.0078 0.69 14 Plot  
Thomsen1   activ_cocaine1_32  
total activity (horizontal plus vertical beam breaks), test 1, 3h duration (cocaine 32 mg/kg i.p.)
male 0.81 p = 0.0081 0.80 9 Plot 0.85
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min1  
distance traveled during 1st minute
male 0.67 p = 0.0091 0.67 14 Plot 0.76
Crowley1   horizontal_actd60  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.49 p = 0.0092 0.52 27 Plot 0.66
behavior – social
Moy1   EntSTR1_nov  
number of entries into chamber with stranger1 (former novel mouse), 10 min test
male 0.89 p = 0.0002 0.88 11 Plot  
Moy1   EntSTR2_nov  
number of entries into chamber with stranger2 (a second novel mouse), 10 min test
male 0.88 p = 0.0003 0.88 11 Plot  
Moy1   EntOBJ_soc  
number of entries into chamber with empty cage (a novel object), 10 min test
male 0.85 p = 0.0009 0.88 11 Plot  
Moy1   EntSTR1_soc  
number of entries into chamber with stranger1 (a novel mouse), 10 min test
male 0.85 p = 0.0010 0.83 11 Plot  
behavior – visuospatial learning
Brown2   vis_acuit_ave_d8  
visual acuity mean latency to reach cued platform, incremental grating, day 8
male –0.85 p = 0.0005 –0.80 12 Plot  
Brown2   vis_acuit64  
visual acuity mean latency to reach cued platform, 0.64 threshold
male –0.83 p = 0.0009 –0.82 12 Plot  
Brown2   vis_acuit32  
visual acuity mean latency to reach cued platform, 0.32 threshold
male –0.82 p = 0.0012 –0.84 12 Plot  
Brown2   pat_disc_ave_d8  
pattern discrimination mean latency to reach cued platform, day 8
male –0.77 p = 0.0035 –0.70 12 Plot  
blood – clinical chemistry – miscellaneous
Berndt3   vitamin_D  
serum vitamin D concentration
male 0.78 p = 0.0082 0.74 10 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – WBC – monocytes
Peters4   pctMONO_M18  
monocyte differential (percent of total WBC) (age 18mo)
male –0.62 p = 0.0061 –0.56 18 Plot -0.70
blood – hematology – platelets
Justice2   PLT  
platelet count (PLT; units per volume x 103)
male 0.80 p = 0.0031 0.74 11 Plot  
blood – xenobiotics – drug and metabolite concentration
Rusyn2   TCA_24_tce  
trichloroacetic acid (serum TCA), t=24h (trichloroethylene )
male –0.72 p = 0.0082 –0.78 12 Plot -0.77
brain – cerebral cortex
Wiltshire3   CREB1_fluox  
cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 (CREB1 formerly CREB), relative fluorescence intensity (fluoxetine )
male 0.64 p = 0.0074 0.73 16 Plot  
Wiltshire3   NPY_fluox  
neuropeptide Y (NPY), relative fluorescence intensity (fluoxetine )
male 0.64 p = 0.0081 0.61 16 Plot  
Wiltshire3   SLC6A2_fluox  
sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter (SLC6A2 formerly NET), relative fluorescence intensity (fluoxetine )
male 0.63 p = 0.0085 0.71 16 Plot  
Wiltshire3   GLO1_index  
glyoxalase 1 (GLO1), change index (fluoxetine )
male 0.63 p = 0.0089 0.47 16 Plot  
Wiltshire3   GSR_index  
glutathione reductase (GSR), change index (fluoxetine )
male 0.63 p = 0.0091 0.61 16 Plot  
ear – hearing
Zheng1   Rpressure  
middle ear pressure at maximum compliance, right ear
male –0.64 p = 0.0054 –0.62 17 Plot  
exercise and endurance
Massett1   exercise_work  
vertical work performed during graded exercise endurance test
male 0.61 p = 0.0024 0.61 22 Plot 0.66
Lightfoot1   activity_distance  
wheel running activity, mean distance
male 0.56 p = 0.0078 0.58 21 Plot  
Mathes1   run_speed12  
running speed, days 11 and 12 (average) of wheel access
male 0.84 p = 0.0096 0.76 8 Plot 0.88
ingestive preference – ethanol and saccharin
Finn1   saccharin  
consumption of 0.2% saccharin in water
male 0.70 p = 0.0078 0.68 13 Plot 0.78
nervous system – development – neurogenesis
Rhodes1   DG_neurons_wheel  
number of new dentate gyrus (granule cell layer) neurons per mouse, with exercise wheel (6wks) (exercise )
male 0.84 p = 0.0043 0.70 9 Plot 0.87
 

72 rows

Reciprocals are included in the above list.

Correlations where Pearson r < 0.5 are not retained and will not appear in the above list.

All correlations available through MPD are mathematical correlations provided for exploratory use, and are not necessarily biologically significant. Additional forms of validation are required. Most correlations are based on strain mean data points which have varying degrees of quality, preciseness, and normality of distribution, and this is generally not taken into account in correlation strength metrics.




Hosted by:
  Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use