Home       About             Help      

Select plot or tool >
Pheno measurements correlated to your selected measurements

Pearson correlation p value
must be p ≤


Download all
At least
strains
in common
are required
Include:
females and males
females only
males only

Order by


More info on correlations


Your selected measurement:
behavior — social — preference for social novelty test         operant chamber  
Moy1
EntSTR2_nov   number of entries into chamber with stranger2 (a second novel mouse), 10 min test   [n]
17 strains   age 6-7wks
  Inbred
 

Download this list as a tab-delimited file
 
Correlated measurement from anywhere in MPD
(organized by category)
Sex Pearson
r
p value
on r
Spearman
rs
# strains
in
common
Click
for
scatterplot
Log-
improved
Pearson
behavior – anxiety
Wiltshire2   OFT_thig_cont  
percent time avoiding center (thigmotaxis)
male –0.86 p < 0.0001 –0.80 14 Plot  
Pletcher1   OFT_thigmotaxis  
percent of center avoidance (thigmotaxis)
male –0.76 p = 0.0010 –0.70 15 Plot  
Wiltshire2   OFT_thig_fluox  
percent time avoiding center (thigmotaxis) (fluoxetine )
male –0.76 p = 0.0015 –0.78 14 Plot  
Wahlsten1   pct_thigmotaxia  
percent of 5 min spent within 10 cm of wall
male –0.68 p = 0.0026 –0.59 17 Plot  
Brown1   close_ent_EPM  
closed arms entries
male 0.82 p = 0.0068 0.77 9 Plot  
behavior – balance and coordination
Crabbe1   bal15_doseB  
missteps crossing 15.8 mm balance beam (ethanol 1.2g/kg i.p.)
male –0.86 p = 0.0065 –0.90 8 Plot -0.89
behavior – exploratory
Crowley1   pct_center_d0  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 0
male 0.93 p < 0.0001 0.83 11 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_ave_OFT  
average distance traveled in 1 min
male 0.81 p < 0.0001 0.76 17 Plot  
Crowley1   pct_center_d120  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.89 p = 0.0002 0.88 11 Plot  
Crowley1   pct_center_d60  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.85 p = 0.0009 0.91 11 Plot  
Crowley1   pct_center_d30  
center occupancy (percent of total time), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.83 p = 0.0014 0.82 11 Plot 0.91
behavior – fear conditioning
HMDPpheno4   cue_vel  
cued fear velocity, day 3
male 0.72 p = 0.0058 0.79 13 Plot  
HMDPpheno4   cue_vel_inb  
cued fear velocity, day 3, inbred strains only
male 0.72 p = 0.0058 0.79 13 Plot  
HMDPpheno4   cue_thig  
cued fear thigmotaxis, percent time spent near chamber walls, day 3
male –0.69 p = 0.0091 –0.81 13 Plot  
HMDPpheno4   cue_thig_inb  
cued fear thigmotaxis, percent time spent near chamber walls, day 3, inbred strains only
male –0.69 p = 0.0091 –0.81 13 Plot  
behavior – impulsivity
Mitchell1   discrim_index  
index of discrimination of Go versus No-go cues
male 0.79 p = 0.0066 0.60 10 Plot  
behavior – involuntary movement
Crowley1   stereotypy_d0  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 0
male 0.88 p = 0.0003 0.88 11 Plot  
Crowley1   stereotypy_d30  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.86 p = 0.0006 0.91 11 Plot  
Crowley1   stereotypy_d60  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.85 p = 0.0010 0.90 11 Plot  
Crowley1   stereotypy_d120  
repeated breaking of the same beam (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.84 p = 0.0014 0.91 11 Plot  
behavior – locomotor activity
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min5  
distance traveled, during 5th minute
male 0.87 p < 0.0001 0.84 17 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min4  
distance traveled, during 4th minute
male 0.86 p < 0.0001 0.84 17 Plot  
Pletcher1   OFT_activity  
total distance traveled, 7 min
male 0.87 p < 0.0001 0.81 15 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min3  
distance traveled during 3rd minute
male 0.84 p < 0.0001 0.79 17 Plot  
Crowley1   horizontal_actd120  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.93 p < 0.0001 0.95 11 Plot  
Wahlsten1   speed_ave_OFT  
average speed over 5 min trial
male 0.81 p < 0.0001 0.75 17 Plot  
Wiltshire1   act_OFT  
total locomotor activity, 10 min
male 0.78 p = 0.0004 0.70 16 Plot 0.82
Crowley1   horizontal_actd60  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 60 (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.87 p = 0.0005 0.85 11 Plot  
Wiltshire2   OFT_dist_cont  
total distance traveled, 7 min
male 0.81 p = 0.0005 0.78 14 Plot  
Wahlsten1   dist_OFT_min2  
distance traveled during 2nd minute
male 0.75 p = 0.0005 0.69 17 Plot  
Wiltshire2   OFT_dist_fluox  
total distance traveled, 7 min (fluoxetine )
male 0.80 p = 0.0006 0.76 14 Plot  
Crowley1   horizontal_actd30  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.86 p = 0.0007 0.85 11 Plot  
Crowley1   horizontal_actd0  
total distance traveled (dur=60min), day 0
male 0.86 p = 0.0007 0.96 11 Plot 0.89
Seburn1   aa_light  
ambulatory, light 12h period (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.79 p = 0.0024 0.71 12 Plot  
Seburn1   tot_light  
total, light 12h period (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.76 p = 0.0043 0.67 12 Plot  
Brown1   activity_LD  
total activity (line crosses plus rearing, dur=5min))
male 0.84 p = 0.0047 0.78 9 Plot 0.89
Crowley1   vertical_actd0  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 0
male 0.78 p = 0.0050 0.73 11 Plot  
Golani1   DST  
total locomotor activity during 30 min test
male 0.87 p = 0.0055 0.69 8 Plot  
Crowley1   vertical_actd120  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 120 (60d post-exposure) (haloperidol 60d)
male 0.76 p = 0.0068 0.80 11 Plot  
Crabbe2   horiz_DZ0  
total horizontal distance traveled (immediately to 15 min post-injection), baseline
male 0.85 p = 0.0069 0.86 8 Plot  
Golani1   PMXS  
median of maximal speed in progression segments, 30 min test
male 0.85 p = 0.0081 0.81 8 Plot 0.89
Seburn1   ra_light  
rearing, light 12h period (vertical beam breaks per minute)
male 0.72 p = 0.0084 0.75 12 Plot  
Seburn1   tot_daily  
total, daily (beam breaks per minute)
male 0.72 p = 0.0085 0.57 12 Plot  
Schalkwyk1   pct_rear_OFTobj  
rearing frequency with novel object
male 0.84 p = 0.0086 0.88 8 Plot  
Crowley1   vertical_actd30  
vertical activity (beam breaks) (dur=60min), day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male 0.74 p = 0.0091 0.91 11 Plot 0.78
behavior – social
Moy1   EntOBJ_soc  
number of entries into chamber with empty cage (a novel object), 10 min test
male 0.99 p < 0.0001 0.98 17 Plot  
Moy1   EntSTR1_nov  
number of entries into chamber with stranger1 (former novel mouse), 10 min test
male 0.99 p < 0.0001 1.00 17 Plot  
Moy1   EntSTR1_soc  
number of entries into chamber with stranger1 (a novel mouse), 10 min test
male 0.98 p < 0.0001 0.95 17 Plot  
behavior – visuospatial learning
Brown2   vis_acuit64  
visual acuity mean latency to reach cued platform, 0.64 threshold
male –0.85 p = 0.0036 –0.82 9 Plot  
blood – clinical chemistry – electrolytes
Yuan3   Mg_M06  
magnesium (serum Mg) (age 6mo)
male 0.78 p = 0.0075 0.78 10 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – RBC – reticulocytes
CGDpheno1   pct_Retic  
reticulocyte differential (percent of total RBC)
male 0.63 p = 0.0071 0.61 17 Plot  
Peters1   Retic  
reticulocyte differential (percent of total RBC)
male 0.62 p = 0.0086 0.75 17 Plot  
exercise and endurance
Lightfoot1   activity_distance  
wheel running activity, mean distance
male 0.67 p = 0.0045 0.62 16 Plot  
Massett1   exercise_work  
vertical work performed during graded exercise endurance test
male 0.68 p = 0.0050 0.63 15 Plot 0.74
ingestive preference – ethanol and saccharin
Finn1   saccharin  
consumption of 0.2% saccharin in water
male 0.77 p = 0.0055 0.86 11 Plot 0.83
ingestive preference – salt solutions
Tordoff3   CaLa_pref7  
preference for 7.5mM CaLa solution
male –0.80 p = 0.0001 –0.78 17 Plot  
Tordoff3   CaLa_pref25  
preference for 25mM CaLa solution
male –0.80 p = 0.0001 –0.86 17 Plot  
Tordoff3   CaLa_pref75  
preference for 75mM CaLa solution
male –0.68 p = 0.0026 –0.76 17 Plot -0.75
Tordoff3   CaCl2_pref25  
preference for 25mM CaCl2 solution
male –0.62 p = 0.0079 –0.69 17 Plot  
Tordoff3   CaCl2_pref7  
preference for 7.5mM CaCl2 solution
male –0.62 p = 0.0082 –0.62 17 Plot  
 

60 rows

Reciprocals are included in the above list.

Correlations where Pearson r < 0.5 are not retained and will not appear in the above list.

All correlations available through MPD are mathematical correlations provided for exploratory use, and are not necessarily biologically significant. Additional forms of validation are required. Most correlations are based on strain mean data points which have varying degrees of quality, preciseness, and normality of distribution, and this is generally not taken into account in correlation strength metrics.




Hosted by:
  Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use