Home       About             Help      

Select plot or tool >
Pheno measurements correlated to your selected measurements

Pearson correlation p value
must be p ≤


Download all
At least
strains
in common
are required
Include:
females and males
females only
males only

Order by


More info on correlations


Your selected measurement:
blood — hematology — hematocrit         CBC  
Peters4
pctHCT_M24   hematocrit (HCT)   [%]
31 strains   age 24mo
  Inbred
 

Download this list as a tab-delimited file
 
Correlated measurement from anywhere in MPD
(organized by category)
Sex Pearson
r
p value
on r
Spearman
rs
# strains
in
common
Click
for
scatterplot
Log-
improved
Pearson
behavior – involuntary movement
Crowley1   subtlechew_d30  
subtle chewing movement, count of events day 30 (haloperidol 30d)
male –0.85 p = 0.0077 –0.88 8 Plot -0.90
blood – clinical chemistry – electrolytes
Yuan3   K_M06  
potassium (serum K) (age 6mo)
female –0.89 p = 0.0006 –0.94 10 Plot  
Tordoff3   ionized_Ca  
blood ionized calcium
female –0.78 p = 0.0081 –0.54 10 Plot  
blood – clinical chemistry – glucose
CGDpheno1   GLU  
glucose (plasma GLU, 4h fast)
female –0.81 p = 0.0086 –0.77 9 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – RBC
Peters4   RBC_M24  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 24mo)
male 0.97 p < 0.0001 0.96 12 Plot  
Peters4   RBC_M24  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 24mo)
female 0.92 p < 0.0001 0.85 11 Plot  
Peters4   RBC_M12  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 12mo)
female 0.79 p = 0.0040 0.48 11 Plot  
Peters4   RBC_M18  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 18mo)
female 0.84 p = 0.0045 0.58 9 Plot  
CGDpheno1   RBC  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106)
male 0.81 p = 0.0047 0.78 10 Plot  
Peters4   RBC_M18  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 18mo)
male 0.73 p = 0.0073 0.72 12 Plot  
Peters4   RBC_M12  
red blood cell count (RBC; per volume x 106) (age 12mo)
male 0.72 p = 0.0083 0.60 12 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – WBC – eosinophils
Peters4   EOS_M24  
eosinophil count (EOS; units per volume x 103) (age 24mo)
female 0.83 p = 0.0014 0.74 11 Plot 0.87
blood – hematology – hematocrit
Peters4   pctHCT_M18  
hematocrit (HCT) (age 18mo)
male 0.71 p = 0.0099 0.67 12 Plot  
blood – hematology – hemoglobin
Peters4   HGB_M24  
hemoglobin (HGB) (age 24mo)
female 0.92 p < 0.0001 0.93 11 Plot  
Peters4   HGB_M24  
hemoglobin (HGB) (age 24mo)
male 0.88 p = 0.0001 0.83 12 Plot  
Peters4   HGB_M18  
hemoglobin (HGB) (age 18mo)
male 0.80 p = 0.0017 0.80 12 Plot  
Peters4   HGB_M12  
hemoglobin (HGB) (age 12mo)
female 0.81 p = 0.0027 0.60 11 Plot  
body composition – fat
Ackert1   fatwt_M06  
weight of fat portion of body mass, head excluded (age 6mo)
female –0.92 p < 0.0001 –0.86 11 Plot  
Ackert1   pctfat_M06  
percent fat of body mass, head excluded (age 6mo)
female –0.86 p = 0.0007 –0.59 11 Plot -0.89
Ackert1   fatwt_M12  
weight of fat portion of body mass, head excluded (age 12mo)
female –0.84 p = 0.0012 –0.81 11 Plot  
Tordoff3   fat_wt  
weight of fat tissue, head excluded
female –0.85 p = 0.0019 –0.88 10 Plot -0.88
Tordoff3   pct_fat  
percent fat, head excluded
female –0.80 p = 0.0058 –0.54 10 Plot  
Ackert1   pctfat_M12  
percent fat of body mass, head excluded (age 12mo)
female –0.75 p = 0.0075 –0.63 11 Plot  
body composition – lean
Ackert1   LTM_M06  
weight of lean tissue mass, head excluded (age 6mo)
female –0.83 p = 0.0017 –0.85 11 Plot  
Tordoff3   lean_wt  
weight of lean tissue, head excluded
female –0.84 p = 0.0025 –0.79 10 Plot  
Tordoff3   pct_lean  
percent lean, head excluded
female 0.80 p = 0.0057 0.54 10 Plot  
Ackert1   LTM_M12  
weight of lean tissue mass, head excluded (age 12mo)
female –0.76 p = 0.0070 –0.82 11 Plot  
CGDpheno1   LTM  
lean tissue mass, head excluded
female –0.80 p = 0.0090 –0.90 9 Plot  
Ackert1   LTM_M20  
weight of lean tissue mass, head excluded (age 20mo)
female –0.74 p = 0.0093 –0.76 11 Plot  
body composition – total
Ackert1   TTM_M06  
total tissue mass, head excluded (age 6mo)
female –0.91 p = 0.0001 –0.88 11 Plot  
Ackert1   TTM_M12  
total tissue mass, head excluded (age 12mo)
female –0.88 p = 0.0003 –0.80 11 Plot  
Tordoff3   total_wt  
total weight (lean + fat), head excluded
female –0.88 p = 0.0008 –0.87 10 Plot  
CGDpheno1   TTM  
total tissue mass, head excluded
female –0.88 p = 0.0019 –0.92 9 Plot  
Ackert1   TTM_M20  
total tissue mass, head excluded (age 20mo)
female –0.77 p = 0.0054 –0.68 11 Plot  
body weight size and growth – body mass index (BMI)
Ackert1   BMI_M12  
body mass index (BMI) (age 12mo)
female –0.85 p = 0.0009 –0.92 11 Plot  
Ackert1   BMI_M20  
body mass index (BMI) (age 20mo)
female –0.75 p = 0.0074 –0.57 11 Plot  
Ackert1   BMI_M06  
body mass index (BMI) (age 6mo)
female –0.74 p = 0.0092 –0.66 11 Plot  
body weight size and growth – body size
Ackert1   total_area_M06  
total body area without head (age 6mo)
female –0.88 p = 0.0004 –0.84 11 Plot  
Ackert1   total_area_M12  
total body area without head (age 12mo)
female –0.81 p = 0.0024 –0.78 11 Plot  
Ackert1   total_area_M20  
total body area without head (age 20mo)
female –0.81 p = 0.0026 –0.76 11 Plot  
body weight size and growth – body weight
Ackert1   BW_M06  
body weight (age 6mo)
female –0.90 p = 0.0001 –0.92 11 Plot  
Yuan1   bw_M06  
body weight (age 6mo)
female –0.88 p = 0.0003 –0.85 11 Plot  
Ackert1   BW_M12  
body weight (age 12mo)
female –0.88 p = 0.0004 –0.80 11 Plot  
Yuan1   bw_M12  
body weight (age 12mo)
female –0.87 p = 0.0005 –0.84 11 Plot  
Yuan1   bw_M18  
body weight (age 18mo)
female –0.84 p = 0.0011 –0.83 11 Plot  
Tordoff3   bw_end  
body weight at end of testing
female –0.87 p = 0.0012 –0.90 10 Plot  
Harrill2   bw_change_trt  
fold change in body weight over testing period (DB289 )
female –0.89 p = 0.0013 –0.82 9 Plot  
CGDpheno1   bodyweight  
body weight
female –0.86 p = 0.0026 –0.92 9 Plot  
Paigen1   initbw  
body weight
female –0.87 p = 0.0046 –0.52 8 Plot -0.90
Ackert1   BW_M20  
body weight (age 20mo)
female –0.77 p = 0.0052 –0.68 11 Plot  
Tordoff3   bw_start  
body weight at start of testing
female –0.80 p = 0.0059 –0.89 10 Plot  
Harrill2   bw_end_trt  
body weight at end of testing (DB289 )
female –0.81 p = 0.0079 –0.71 9 Plot  
cell and tissue damage – chromosome instability
Mills1   RBC_micronucl_M12  
RBC with micronuclei (age 12mo)
female –0.78 p = 0.0073 –0.76 10 Plot  
ear – hearing
Zheng1   Lgradient  
middle ear gradient at maximum compliance, left ear
male 0.86 p = 0.0065 0.71 8 Plot  
immune system – cell counts – peripheral blood
Petkova1   NK_M06  
natural killer (NK) cells (as percent of total lymphocytes) (age 6mo)
female –0.75 p = 0.0072 –0.84 11 Plot  
ingestive preference – salt solutions
Tordoff3   CaCl2_pref75  
preference for 75mM CaCl2 solution
male 0.75 p = 0.0075 0.73 11 Plot  
kidney – function
Harrill2   urine_vol_trt  
urine volume (DB289 )
female –0.87 p = 0.0024 –0.90 9 Plot  
Korstanje1   MA_M18  
microalbumin (urine MA) (age 18mo)
female –0.77 p = 0.0059 –0.46 11 Plot  
kidney – morphology
Harrill2   Lt_kidney_ctrl  
kidney (left) weight
female –0.83 p = 0.0059 –0.78 9 Plot  
liver – enzyme homeostasis
Threadgill1   CYP2E1_Rx300  
cytochrome P450 2E1, liver left lobe (acetaminophen 300 mg/kg)
male 0.77 p = 0.0035 0.75 12 Plot  
Threadgill1   CYP1A2_Rx300  
cytochrome P450 1A2, liver left lobe (acetaminophen 300 mg/kg)
male 0.73 p = 0.0069 0.69 12 Plot  
liver – weight
Paigen1   liverweight  
liver weight at sacrifice (high-fat diet 8wks)
female –0.84 p = 0.0044 –0.72 9 Plot  
respiratory – breathing pattern
Berndt2   penh_mch10  
enhanced pause (Penh) (methacholine 10mg/mL)
female –0.87 p = 0.0026 –0.73 9 Plot  
Berndt2   breath_freq_slope  
breath frequency (F), MCh response index (methacholine )
female 0.84 p = 0.0048 0.65 9 Plot  
Berndt2   tot_respi_slope  
total respiratory time (Ttot), MCh response index (methacholine )
female –0.80 p = 0.0096 –0.52 9 Plot  
 

65 rows

Reciprocals are included in the above list.

Correlations where Pearson r < 0.5 are not retained and will not appear in the above list.

All correlations available through MPD are mathematical correlations provided for exploratory use, and are not necessarily biologically significant. Additional forms of validation are required. Most correlations are based on strain mean data points which have varying degrees of quality, preciseness, and normality of distribution, and this is generally not taken into account in correlation strength metrics.




Hosted by:
  Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use