Home       About             Help      

Select plot or tool >
Pheno measurements correlated to your selected measurements

Pearson correlation p value
must be p ≤


Download all
At least
strains
in common
are required
Include:
females and males
females only
males only

Order by


More info on correlations


Your selected measurement:
behavior — balance and coordination         rotarod  
Lake3
constant3   latency to fall from 4rpm rotarod, trial3   [s] 23 strains   age 8-9wks
  B6.A consomic
 

Download this list as a tab-delimited file
 
Correlated measurement from anywhere in MPD
(organized by category)
Sex Pearson
r
p value
on r
Spearman
rs
# strains
in
common
Click
for
scatterplot
Log-
improved
Pearson
behavior – anxiety
Donahue3   episodes_stereotypic  
number of discrete stereotypic episodes (repetitive activity), 10 min test
female 0.79 p < 0.0001 0.20 22 Plot  
Lake3   stretch_attends  
number of stretch attends in 5 min test
male –0.73 p < 0.0001 –0.39 23 Plot  
Donahue3   distance_perimeter  
distance traveled along perimeter of arena (thigmotaxis), 10 min test
female 0.75 p < 0.0001 0.59 22 Plot 0.85
Donahue3   duration_stereotypic  
duration of stereotypic behavior (repetitive activity), 10 min test
male 0.74 p < 0.0001 0.47 22 Plot  
Donahue3   breaks_stereotypic  
number of stereotypic beam breaks (repetitive activity), 10 min test
male 0.72 p = 0.0001 0.40 22 Plot 0.76
Donahue3   duration_perimeter  
duration of activity along perimeter of arena (thigmotaxis), 10 min test
female 0.72 p = 0.0002 0.25 22 Plot 0.83
Donahue3   episodes_stereotypic  
number of discrete stereotypic episodes (repetitive activity), 10 min test
male 0.70 p = 0.0003 0.25 22 Plot  
Donahue3   breaks_stereotypic  
number of stereotypic beam breaks (repetitive activity), 10 min test
female 0.68 p = 0.0005 0.32 22 Plot 0.78
Donahue3   duration_stereotypic  
duration of stereotypic behavior (repetitive activity), 10 min test
female 0.67 p = 0.0006 0.19 22 Plot 0.75
Donahue3   distance_perimeter  
distance traveled along perimeter of arena (thigmotaxis), 10 min test
male 0.67 p = 0.0006 0.33 22 Plot 0.73
Lake2   defecation_jar  
number of fecal boli in view-jar
female –0.61 p = 0.0018 0.05 23 Plot  
Donahue3   breaks_rearing  
number of rearing beam breaks, 10 min test
female 0.57 p = 0.0054 0.25 22 Plot 0.77
Donahue3   episodes_rearing  
number of discrete rearing episodes, 10 min test
female 0.55 p = 0.0083 0.14 22 Plot 0.75
behavior – balance and coordination
Lake3   constant2  
latency to fall from 4rpm rotarod, trial2
male 0.87 p < 0.0001 0.65 23 Plot  
Lake3   constant1  
latency to fall from 4rpm rotarod, trial1
male 0.80 p < 0.0001 0.73 23 Plot 0.83
Lake3   constant2  
latency to fall from 4rpm rotarod, trial2
female 0.79 p < 0.0001 0.79 23 Plot  
Lake3   stationary3  
rotarod habituation, latency to fall from stationary rotarod, trial3
female 0.76 p < 0.0001 0.67 23 Plot  
Lake3   constant1  
latency to fall from 4rpm rotarod, trial1
female 0.74 p < 0.0001 0.71 23 Plot  
Lake3   accel3  
latency to fall from accelerating (60rpm/min) rotarod, trial3
male 0.71 p = 0.0001 0.39 23 Plot 0.75
Lake3   stationary2  
rotarod habituation, latency to fall from stationary rotarod, trial2
female 0.60 p = 0.0027 0.49 23 Plot  
Lake3   accel3  
latency to fall from accelerating (60rpm/min) rotarod, trial3
female 0.58 p = 0.0035 0.39 23 Plot 0.70
Lake3   accel2  
latency to fall from accelerating (60rpm/min) rotarod, trial2
female 0.57 p = 0.0049 0.59 23 Plot 0.71
behavior – exploratory
Lake3   lat_perimeter  
latency to visit perimeter, 5 min test
male –0.74 p < 0.0001 –0.42 23 Plot  
Lake3   lat_perimeter  
latency to visit perimeter, 5 min test
female –0.68 p = 0.0003 –0.11 23 Plot  
Lake3   arena_entries  
number of arena entries in 5 min test
male 0.60 p = 0.0026 0.38 23 Plot 0.72
Lake3   arena_entries  
number of arena entries in 5 min test
female 0.54 p = 0.0085 0.33 23 Plot 0.65
behavior – fear conditioning
Palmer1   pretraining_freezing  
time freezing before exposure to shock, from 30-180 s, day 1
female –0.91 p < 0.0001 –0.13 19 Plot  
Palmer1   freezing_altered  
time freezing in altered context (no tone) with 48 h history
and exposure to shock, from 30-180 s, day 3
male –0.80 p < 0.0001 –0.46 18 Plot  
Palmer1   freezing_altered  
time freezing in altered context (no tone) with 48 h history
and exposure to shock, from 30-180 s, day 3
female –0.77 p = 0.0001 0.05 19 Plot  
Palmer1   freezing_to_context  
time freezing in context with 24 h history and exposure to shock,
from 30-180 s, day 2
male –0.60 p = 0.0079 –0.41 18 Plot  
behavior – locomotor activity
Donahue3   episodes_horiz  
number of discrete horizontal episodes, 10 min test
female 0.81 p < 0.0001 0.41 22 Plot  
Palmer2   methactivity_d3_OFT  
total distance traveled (dur=30min, 30min post-Rx injection), day 3 (methamphetamine 2 mg/kg i.p.)
female 0.78 p < 0.0001 0.52 21 Plot 0.91
Donahue3   duration_horiz  
duration of total horizontal activity, 10 min test
female 0.76 p < 0.0001 0.61 22 Plot 0.85
Donahue3   duration_horiz  
duration of total horizontal activity, 10 min test
male 0.75 p < 0.0001 0.49 22 Plot  
Donahue3   breaks_horiz  
total number of horizontal beam breaks, 10 min test
female 0.74 p < 0.0001 0.38 22 Plot 0.81
Donahue3   distance_total  
total distance traveled, 10 min test
female 0.74 p < 0.0001 0.52 22 Plot 0.84
Donahue3   breaks_horiz  
total number of horizontal beam breaks, 10 min test
male 0.72 p = 0.0002 0.31 22 Plot  
Donahue3   distance_total  
total distance traveled, 10 min test
male 0.71 p = 0.0002 0.35 22 Plot 0.75
Donahue3   distance_center  
distance traveled in center of arena, 10 min test
male 0.68 p = 0.0005 0.39 22 Plot 0.76
Donahue3   episodes_horiz  
number of discrete horizontal episodes, 10 min test
male 0.68 p = 0.0005 0.05 22 Plot  
Palmer2   methactivity2_OFT  
change in activity after methamphetamine and habituation (day3–day2) (methamphetamine 2 mg/kg i.p.)
female 0.68 p = 0.0008 0.50 21 Plot  
Lake3   line_crossings  
number of line crossings in 5 min test
male 0.65 p = 0.0008 0.38 23 Plot 0.74
Donahue3   distance_center  
distance traveled in center of arena, 10 min test
female 0.66 p = 0.0009 0.40 22 Plot 0.83
Palmer2   activity_d1_OFT  
total distance traveled (dur=30min, 30min post-saline injection), day 1 baseline
female 0.67 p = 0.0009 0.46 21 Plot 0.83
Lake3   tot_activity  
total locomotor activity (line crosses plus rearings) in 5 min test
male 0.62 p = 0.0014 0.39 23 Plot 0.74
Palmer2   methactivity1_OFT  
change in activity after methamphetamine (day3–day1) (methamphetamine 2 mg/kg i.p.)
female 0.64 p = 0.0018 0.50 21 Plot  
Lake2   activity  
spontaneous activity level in view-jar (score 0-3)
female 0.59 p = 0.0031 0.48 23 Plot 0.64
Palmer2   activity_d2_OFT  
total distance traveled (dur=30min, 30min post-saline injection), day 2 baseline
female 0.61 p = 0.0031 0.50 21 Plot 0.78
Donahue3   episodes_vert  
number of discrete vertical episodes, 10 min test
female 0.57 p = 0.0055 0.21 22 Plot 0.76
Lake3   tot_activity  
total locomotor activity (line crosses plus rearings) in 5 min test
female 0.55 p = 0.0071 0.36 23 Plot 0.73
Palmer2   activity_d1_OFT  
total distance traveled (dur=30min, 30min post-saline injection), day 1 baseline
male 0.57 p = 0.0074 0.17 21 Plot 0.74
Lake3   line_crossings  
number of line crossings in 5 min test
female 0.54 p = 0.0081 0.37 23 Plot 0.73
behavior – wildness
Lake2   irritability  
assessment of irritability during supine restraint (score 0-1)
female 0.77 p < 0.0001 0.75 23 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – WBC – lymphocytes
Lake1   pct_LYM  
lymphocyte differential (percent of total WBC)
male 0.62 p = 0.0015 0.52 23 Plot 0.67
blood – hematology – cell counts – WBC – neutrophils
Lake1   pct_NEUT  
neutrophil differential (percent of total WBC)
male –0.67 p = 0.0005 –0.41 23 Plot -0.70
bone – mineral density and content
Donahue16   body_BMD  
whole body bone mineral density (BMD)
male 0.55 p = 0.0063 0.32 23 Plot  
cardiovascular – ECG parameters
Lake1   QT  
interval between peak of Q-wave to end of T-wave (QT)
female –0.56 p = 0.0051 0.22 23 Plot  
Lake1   RR  
interval between R-waves (RR)
female –0.55 p = 0.0063 0.16 23 Plot  
cardiovascular – heart rate
Lake1   HR_cv  
heart rate coefficient of variance
male –0.58 p = 0.0036 –0.45 23 Plot  
Lake1   HRV  
heart rate variability
male –0.58 p = 0.0037 –0.42 23 Plot  
ear – hearing
Johnson3   ABR_16kHz  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), 16 kHz sound stimulus
male –0.71 p = 0.0001 –0.07 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_click  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), click stimulus
male –0.70 p = 0.0002 –0.10 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_8kHz  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), 8 kHz sound stimulus
male –0.68 p = 0.0003 –0.16 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_click  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), click stimulus
female –0.68 p = 0.0004 0.09 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_32kHz  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), 32 kHz sound stimulus
male –0.66 p = 0.0007 –0.15 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_8kHz  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), 8 kHz sound stimulus
female –0.59 p = 0.0031 0.23 23 Plot  
Johnson3   ABR_16kHz  
auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold (sound pressure level), 16 kHz sound stimulus
female –0.57 p = 0.0045 0.19 23 Plot  
neurosensory – sensory gating
Petryshen1   ASR_ns  
acoustic startle response (ASR) to 65 dB constant background noise, no tone and no prepulse stimulus
male –0.63 p = 0.0021 –0.43 21 Plot  
reproduction – fecundity
Donahue19   pup_survival  
percent of pups that survived to day 3
female 0.58 p = 0.0046 0.29 22 Plot 0.74
reproduction – fertility
Donahue19   gestation  
gestation duration
female –0.74 p < 0.0001 –0.10 22 Plot -0.79
 

70 rows

Reciprocals are included in the above list.

Correlations where Pearson r < 0.5 are not retained and will not appear in the above list.

All correlations available through MPD are mathematical correlations provided for exploratory use, and are not necessarily biologically significant. Additional forms of validation are required. Most correlations are based on strain mean data points which have varying degrees of quality, preciseness, and normality of distribution, and this is generally not taken into account in correlation strength metrics.




Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use