Home       About             Help      

Select plot or tool >
Pheno measurements correlated to your selected measurements

Pearson correlation p value
must be p ≤


Download all
At least
strains
in common
are required
Include:
females and males
females only
males only

Order by


More info on correlations


Your selected measurement:
bone — morphology — craniofacial         metric  
Everett1
incisor_region   mandible, diastema to pogonion   [mm]
14 strains   age 8-9wks
  Inbred
 

Download this list as a tab-delimited file
 
Correlated measurement from anywhere in MPD
(organized by category)
Sex Pearson
r
p value
on r
Spearman
rs
# strains
in
common
Click
for
scatterplot
Log-
improved
Pearson
behavior – anxiety
Brown1   groom_EZM  
grooming duration
male 0.89 p = 0.0014 0.83 9 Plot  
behavior – exploratory
Schalkwyk1   entry_open_EPM  
number of open arms entries
male 0.84 p = 0.0087 0.64 8 Plot  
behavior – involuntary movement
Metten2   peak_EtOH  
peak HIC (ethanol aerosolized)
male –0.86 p = 0.0067 –0.71 8 Plot -0.89
behavior – locomotor activity
Wahlsten1   dist_EPM_min4  
distance traveled, elevated plus maze minute 4
male 0.74 p = 0.0096 0.53 11 Plot  
blood – clinical chemistry – electrolytes
Yuan3   Mg_M12  
magnesium (serum Mg) (age 12mo)
male 0.78 p = 0.0076 0.59 10 Plot 0.81
Yuan3   Fe_M06  
iron (serum Fe) (age 6mo)
male –0.81 p = 0.0086 –0.42 9 Plot  
blood – hematology – cell counts – WBC – lymphocytes
Peters4   LYMPH_M18  
lymphocyte count (LYMP; units per volume x 103) (age 18mo)
male 0.78 p = 0.0078 0.36 10 Plot  
Peters4   LYMPH_M06  
lymphocyte count (LYMP; units per volume x 103) (age 6mo)
male 0.74 p = 0.0087 0.41 11 Plot  
blood – hematology – hematocrit
Peters1   HCT  
hematocrit (HCT)
male 0.70 p = 0.0081 0.72 13 Plot  
blood – hematology – hemoglobin
Peters1   MCHC  
mean RBC corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
male –0.76 p = 0.0028 –0.56 13 Plot  
blood – hematology – RBC parameters
CGDpheno1   RDW  
RBC corpuscular distribution width (RDW)
male –0.77 p = 0.0057 –0.92 11 Plot  
body composition – lean
Tordoff3   lean_wt  
weight of lean tissue, head excluded
male 0.70 p = 0.0083 0.82 13 Plot  
body weight size and growth – body weight
Seburn1   bw_in  
body weight at start of testing
male 0.88 p = 0.0039 0.95 8 Plot  
Tordoff3   bw_chg  
fold change in body weight
female 0.66 p = 0.0097 0.56 14 Plot  
bone – morphology
Vinyard1   jaw_length  
distance from the incisor alveolus to the caudal surface of the mandibular condyle (jaw length)
female 0.89 p = 0.0003 0.77 11 Plot  
Everett1   ant_area  
mandible, anterior area
male 0.82 p = 0.0007 0.90 13 Plot  
Everett1   ant_length  
mandible, infradentale to menton
male 0.80 p = 0.0011 0.75 13 Plot  
Everett1   ant_area  
mandible, anterior area
female 0.77 p = 0.0012 0.68 14 Plot  
Everett1   ant_length  
mandible, infradentale to menton
female 0.76 p = 0.0015 0.60 14 Plot  
Everett1   post_area  
mandible, posterior area
male 0.77 p = 0.0019 0.83 13 Plot  
Everett1   molar_condyle  
mandible, posterior molar to posterior condyle
male 0.76 p = 0.0024 0.78 13 Plot  
Everett1   incisor_condyle  
mandible, infradentale to posterior condyle
male 0.74 p = 0.0036 0.82 13 Plot  
Everett1   ramus_height  
mandible, antegonion to sigmoid
female 0.71 p = 0.0047 0.75 14 Plot  
Everett1   post_area  
mandible, posterior area
female 0.71 p = 0.0048 0.60 14 Plot  
Everett1   molar_condyle  
mandible, posterior molar to posterior condyle
female 0.69 p = 0.0062 0.52 14 Plot  
Everett1   mid_height  
mandible, posterior molar to menton
female 0.67 p = 0.0087 0.57 14 Plot 0.70
Everett1   mid_height  
mandible, posterior molar to menton
male 0.69 p = 0.0088 0.83 13 Plot  
Vinyard1   jaw_length  
distance from the incisor alveolus to the caudal surface of the mandibular condyle (jaw length)
male 0.74 p = 0.0093 0.73 11 Plot  
Donahue1   skull_width  
skull width
male 0.77 p = 0.0095 0.83 10 Plot  
brain – morphology
Wahlsten1   ac_area  
cross-sectional area of anterior commissure at midplane
male 0.77 p = 0.0051 0.77 11 Plot  
cardiovascular – ECG parameters
Maurer1   RR_iso1  
interval between R-waves (RR) (isoproterenol 1mg/kg 2wks)
male –0.84 p = 0.0046 –0.84 9 Plot -0.87
cardiovascular – heart rate
Maurer1   HR_iso1  
heart rate (isoproterenol 1mg/kg 2wks)
male 0.88 p = 0.0019 0.88 9 Plot  
Maurer1   HR_iso10  
heart rate (isoproterenol 10mg/kg 2wks)
male 0.81 p = 0.0082 0.88 9 Plot  
cell and tissue damage – apoptosis
Mills1   late_apoptotic_M20  
splenocytes that are late apoptotic (age 20mo)
male –0.81 p = 0.0085 –0.78 9 Plot -0.86
endocrine – hormones
Yuan3   T4_M18  
thyroxine/T4 (serum T4) (age 18mo)
male 0.81 p = 0.0049 0.70 10 Plot  
gallbladder – pathology and gallstones
Paigen1   agLC  
aggregated liquid crystals (score: 0-4) (high-fat diet 8wks)
male 0.83 p = 0.0008 0.76 12 Plot  
Paigen1   gs  
number of true gallstones (high-fat diet 8wks)
male 0.73 p = 0.0071 0.81 12 Plot 0.83
immune system – cell counts – peripheral blood
Petkova1   CD4_all_M18  
CD4 T cells (as percent of total lymphocytes) (age 18mo)
female –0.80 p = 0.0028 –0.70 11 Plot -0.89
Petkova1   B_cells_M12  
B cells (as percent of total lymphocytes) (age 12mo)
male 0.78 p = 0.0045 0.50 11 Plot  
Petkova1   CD4_all_M12  
CD4 T cells (as percent of total lymphocytes) (age 12mo)
male –0.76 p = 0.0061 –0.60 11 Plot -0.89
kidney – xenobiotics
Harrill2   kidney_DB75_trt  
kidney metabolite (DB75) concentration (DB289 )
female 0.85 p = 0.0038 0.66 9 Plot  
metabolism – respiratory
Seburn1   VO2_light  
oxygen volume, light 12h period
male –0.87 p = 0.0051 –0.77 8 Plot  
Seburn1   VO2_daily  
oxygen volume, daily
male –0.87 p = 0.0051 –0.67 8 Plot  
Seburn1   VO2_dark  
oxygen volume, dark 12h period
male –0.85 p = 0.0075 –0.67 8 Plot  
neurosensory – sensory gating
Willott1   ASR_80  
acoustic startle response (ASR) evoked by 80 dB sound pressure level
female 0.73 p = 0.0048 0.54 13 Plot  
 

45 rows

Reciprocals are included in the above list.

Correlations where Pearson r < 0.5 are not retained and will not appear in the above list.

All correlations available through MPD are mathematical correlations provided for exploratory use, and are not necessarily biologically significant. Additional forms of validation are required. Most correlations are based on strain mean data points which have varying degrees of quality, preciseness, and normality of distribution, and this is generally not taken into account in correlation strength metrics.




Hosted by:
  Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use