Home       About             Help      

Projects > Crabbe5 >
Crabbe5 project protocol

Crabbe JC with Kamens HM, Phillips TJ, Holstein SE

Drug study: Assessment of ethanol sensitivity and intoxication using the parallel rod floor apparatus, in 8 inbred strains of mice

An investigation of the effects of alcohol by measuring locomotor activity and motor incoordination before and after administration of ethanol.

Study design: control vs. intervention; 2 cohorts.
8 strains tested     female male     Test age: 7-14wks

Crabbe5 project data page       Animals and environment

 

 
Crabbe5 Protocol

Project protocol — Contents
Workflow, sampling, and experimental treatment
Equipment
Reagents,supplies, and solutions
Procedure: Parallel rod floor test for motor incoordination
Data
References



Workflow, sampling, and experimental treatment

Strains were serially tested on four floor types (see details below).  Animals were randomized into two groups per strain. 

Group 1 floor order: E, A, D, B

Group 2 floor order: A, E, D, B

Each mouse was tested before (saline control) and after EtOH treatment.

Each mouse was tested on four platforms of the parallel rod floor apparatus (see Equipment below) on a rotating 3-day injection schedule.  Mice were undisturbed for six days between platforms. 

Workflow

Day Injection Tested Data collected
1
Saline
Yes
Yes
2
Saline
Yes
Yes
3
EtOH
Yes
Yes
4-9
None *
No
No
* Recovery period before next platform

Treatment

Dose 2g EtOH per kg body weight [g/kg]
Delivery intraperitoneal injection (i.p.)

Equipment

Parallel rod floor apparatus is described in detail in Crabbe et al., 2003 and more information in Kamens et al., 2005

Briefly, a clear acrylic box sits is placed on top of a parallel rod floor which is 1 cm above a base plate.  The apparatus is set inside an activity monitor.  The activity monitor is housed in a sound-insulated black acrylic chamber equipped with fluorescent lighting and a ventilating fan.  Errors are recorded by an Apple IIE computer when a paw slips through the rods and completes an electrical circuit with the base plate.  The activity monitor records horizontal distance traveled (detected by photocell beam breaks).

Parallel rod floor configurations

Floor * (apparatus) Rod diameter (mm) Inter-rod distance (mm)
A
1.6
4
B
1.6
6
D
3.2
6
E
4.8
6
* A, B, D, E are described in Kamens et al., 2005.
Configuration C was not used for testing.

AccuScan Activity Monitor, Columbus OH, USA

Reagents, supplies, solutions

  • Test agent: ethanol (EtOH), Pharmoco Inc, Brookfield CT, USA;
  • EtOH solution prepared at 20% v/v in saline
  • Saline (physiological saline): 0.9%, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield IL, USA
  • Isopropyl alcohol: 10% for wipe downs between testsAcclimation to test conditions

Acclimation

Mice are acclimated to room environment 45-60 min before testing.

Procedure: Parallel rod floor test for motor incoordination

a. Randomly selected mice are i.p. injected with saline or EtOH.
b. Each mouse is immediately positioned in the center of the parallel rod floor apparatus (see Equipment above for details), and testing begins.
c. Mice are monitored and data collected over 15 min of testing.

d. The apparatus is cleared and wiped with 10% isopropyl alcohol after each test.

Data collected by investigator

Distance traveled and number of paw slips (errors)

Definitions & formulas

Motor incoordination (err) = (#errors / distance traveled) x 100


    Data available through MPD


    Primary project publication

      Kamens HM, Phillips TJ, Holstein SE, Crabbe JC. Characterization of the parallel rod floor apparatus to test motor incoordination in mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2005 Jun;4(4):253-66.     PubMed 15924557     MGI

    Other references

      Crabbe JC, Metten P, Ponomarev I, Prescott CA, Wahlsten D. Effects of genetic and procedural variation on measurement of alcohol sensitivity in mouse inbred strains. Behav Genet. 2006 Jul;36(4):536-52. Epub 2006 Apr 18.     PubMed 16619134     MGI

      Crabbe JC, Metten P, Yu CH, Schlumbohm JP, Cameron AJ, Wahlsten D. Genotypic Differences in Ethanol Sensitivity in Two Tests of Motor Incoordination. J Appl Physiol. 2003 Oct;95(4):1338-51. Epub 2003 Apr 18.     PubMed 12704090     MGI

      Crabbe JC, Phillips TJ, Harris RA, Arends MA, Koob GF. Alcohol-related genes: contributions from studies with genetically engineered mice. Addict Biol. 2006 Sep;11(3-4):195-269.     PubMed 16961758     MGI

      Cronise K, Finn DA, Metten P, Crabbe JC. Scheduled access to ethanol results in motor impairment and tolerance in female C57BL/6J mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Aug;81(4):943-53.     PubMed 16099022     MGI

      Kliethermes CL, Cronise K, Crabbe JC. Home cage activity and ingestive behaviors in mice following chronic ethanol vapor inhalation. Physiol Behav. 2005 Jul 21;85(4):479-88.     PubMed 16005034     MGI

      Lovinger DM, Crabbe JC. Laboratory models of alcoholism: treatment target identification and insight into mechanisms. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1471-80.     PubMed 16251990     MGI

      Mulligan MK, Ponomarev I, Hitzemann RJ, Belknap JK, Tabakoff B, Harris RA, Crabbe JC, Blednov YA, Grahame NJ, Phillips TJ, Finn DA, Hoffman PL, Iyer VR, Koob GF, Bergeson SE. Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6368-73. Epub 2006 Apr 17.     PubMed 16618939     MGI

      Rustay NR, Wahlsten D, Crabbe JC. Influence of task parameters on rotarod performance and sensitivity to ethanol in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2003 May 15;141(2):237-49.     PubMed 12742261     MGI


    Web resources





 


Compiled and reviewed by MPD staff in conjunction with contributing investigators.

Send comments or suggestions for this page







Contact us
About MPD
Also at JAX
  Units
Changelog
Downloads
  Citing
Funding
Terms of Use